Work order
What was requested.
Screen three sample CV summaries against an operations coordinator role and prepare interview focus notes.
Work receipt rec_sample_ruth_cv_screen
Ruth screened sample CVs
A manually crafted sample receipt showing what a recruitment robot trial should prove.
Robot assigned
Ruth · Recruitment Robot
Ruth finds and screens candidates before hiring becomes a mess.
Steps taken
-
1. Read role brief
Pulled criteria from the supplied coordinator role.
-
2. Mapped evidence
Compared each CV summary against the criteria.
-
3. Prepared questions
Wrote interview focus notes for human review.
Checks run
Criteria match
Mapped each note to the supplied role criteria.
Fairness
Ignored irrelevant personal details and protected-characteristic inference.
Human decision
Kept all final hiring decisions with the human manager.
Output
What came back.
Shortlist notes:
Candidate A: strongest evidence for recurring admin ownership and vendor follow-up.
Candidate B: good scheduling background, missing process-improvement examples.
Candidate C: strong written communication, unclear operations ownership.
Interview focus:
Ask each candidate for one example of cleaning up a recurring process.
Keep final hiring judgement with the human hiring manager.
Proof / evidence
What happened.
20:55:32 · received
Task received
The sample work order was logged.
20:56:32 · assigned
Robot assigned
Ruth was assigned to the sample run.
20:57:32 · worked
Output drafted
The manually crafted launch output was produced.
20:58:32 · checked
Checks run
The sample was checked for clarity, limitations and approval notes.
20:59:32 · receipt
Receipt issued
The receipt was stored as a shareable proof object.
Limitations
What is not proven.
The CVs were short summaries, not full applications.
References and work samples were not checked.
Ruth does not make final hiring decisions.
Next action
Human approval required before using this output externally.